New debt will reach 1 trillion euros by the end of 2026, as sources at public television and radio stations confirm. 1 trillion euros—1,000,000,000,000 euros—in new debt is an amount that exceeds the total government tax revenue, which stands at approximately 989.8 billion euros, by about 10 billion.
The question is whether such a high level of new debt will lead to misallocations—which, as evidenced by comparisons of public versus private debt, is to be expected. The plan was to use the new debt for investment purposes, but in reality, great parts of government budget is already being spent on funding the civil service and public sector workforce. Thus, budget shortfalls are being plugged instead of addressing infrastructure investments—such as road and rail transportation, as well as the renovation of schools, kindergartens, and swimming pools—and maintaining the social safety nets for long-term contributors.
The so-called social reforms—which have been promised for thirty years—that the established parties are now tackling are, in reality, the most severe social cutbacks at the expense of those who are already living in precarious financial situations, and will—as the middle classes will soon come to realize—mark the beginning of a spiral of extreme decline. Examples of this include retirement at age 70, cuts to youth and integration assistance, the planned elimination of the widow’s pension—resulting from the introduction of mandatory pension splitting, whereby married couples must forgo the surviving spouse’s insurance coverage, so that the widower or widow receives no pension as a surviving spouse— and the erosion of social gains such as the eight-hour workday and medical benefits such as dental prosthetics and joint replacement surgery.
The alleged agents of the internationalist globalists prefer to pour money into arms projects: Yet it would be sensible to invest these financial resources, which are currently flowing into the arms industry, into the social welfare systems—notably for long-term contributors, and not for foreign nationals who migrate en masse into the social welfare systems but do not contribute to them. Instead of inflating the military-industrial complex and thereby increasing the risk of war, we should return to a civilian economy and redirect the funds currently flowing into armaments toward social welfare systems.
Isn’t it a bit illogical to bring foreign nationals to Germany who have very poor education or are even illiterate in their countries of origin, and instead of investing money in their education, to squander it on armaments—or even use it to finance offensive weapons? The madness doesn’t stop there, because these offensive weapons could be used to attack countries from which so many have already fled, which could lead to further waves of refugees.
The established parties, which have largely dominated German politics for over seventy years—along with the Alliance 90/The Greens, the Free Democrats, and the Left Party; indeed, one could even include the “SED light” (!)—as well as the SPD, which calls itself social democratic and from which one would have expected policies aligned with the working class, and the “C” parties (CDU and CSU)—which have long since ceased to deserve that “C,” and one must fear they have switched sides—are effectively negating their very own core values.
We can readily quote the parable from the Bible here: “You have eyes but do not see, and ears but do not hear, and do not take it to heart” Mark 8:18
Ultimately, one wonders what the intention is behind the government’s measures: Could it not be that the ruling Camarilla in the Federal Republic of Germany is seeking to impoverish the people through a policy of systematic impoverishment, one need only point here to the plan for burden-sharing, as it took place in the 1950s after World War II, and the mobilization of hard-earned and taxed money, as already announced by Comrade Chancellor, into a form of debt or monetary servitude? In any case, what we see here is a completely misguided social policy that favors only those who have not contributed even the slightest bit to our social system, and a legally questionable military buildup in which the only beneficiaries are the friends and profiteers of the ruling political class.
The conclusion is that the government’s goal is to use the population’s already taxed and hard-earned wealth—in order to secure its own power—for military spending and a completely misguided and catastrophic Social and Climate Policy.
To counter those who dismiss critics of Bavarian state independence or autonomy, this essay is offered as an argument that Bavaria can do better not only because of the failings mentioned here.
“The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the position of the Bavaria Party“
Foto: Bundesarchiv Bild 102-11020, Berlin-Neukölln, Lunch in a heated hall.jpg, CC BY-SA 3.0 de The following text was added to the top left of the photo: „INTERNATIONAL bp-franken.org“
Kommentar verfassen